Jim Westveer writes: > > On 03-Aug-2000 Matthew Vernon wrote: > > Dale Scheetz writes: > > > > > I just can't understand the reluctance to satisfy this requirement > > except > > > that it is viewed by some as being too hard. I cannot, for the life of > > me, > > > > You've not been reading my emails then. I don't want random people > > having a copy of my passport digitised (worse still, digitised and > > signed my me). I know other people who would be unhappy about > > this. It's not necessary, so ditch it. > > AAAAHHH its the copy of the passport idea you do not like. False assertion. <snip>
> It does NOT say "Passport" or "Drivers Licence" or anything of that sort. > It simply says "appropriate piece of photo-identification". So? Passport was mearly a convenient example. Any form of photo-id that's meaningful I don't want people to have digitised copies of lying around. > I would think that having ones key signed, as important as it might be, > is a totally different level of trust than having ones key put in the > Debian keyring. *boggle* The whole point of keysigning is that you trust this person, and they should be included in your web of trust - i.e. your keyring. Matthew -- Rapun.sel - outermost outpost of the Pick Empire http://www.pick.ucam.org
