On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 16:44, Lee Braiden wrote: > On Saturday 19 Jul 2003 1:10 pm, you wrote: > > I have to admit that I'm rather > > indignant about this "advice." (on this list, no less!) > > Me too. I'm not one to get indignant often, but what's the point of having > ppc support in 2.6 if it's not actually a supported config? Better to > declare that it's not supported, surely, and then maybe people would step up > and do something.
Err, I'm not sure you'd have gotten even this far with 2.4.0-test1 vanilla... This is how Linux kernel development works, if you don't like it, speak up on the linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org list. > > However, I have > > been told via irc that woody doesn't have a sufficient tool chain to > > properly compile 2.6.0-testx kernel yet > > I've heard similar, but the kind of compilation problems I get suggest > untested code, not compiler incompatibities. As others have pointed out, use the linuxppc-2.5 tree. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
