Am 20.05.21 um 20:01 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > > On 5/20/21 8:38 PM, Steffen Möller wrote: >> Am 20.05.21 um 16:36 schrieb Nilesh Patra: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 5/20/21 4:09 PM, Steffen Möller wrote: >>>> Am 20.05.21 um 12:19 schrieb Nilesh Patra: >>>>> On Thu, 20 May, 2021, 3:45 pm Steffen Möller, <steffen_moel...@gmx.de >>>>> <mailto:steffen_moel...@gmx.de>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Am 20.05.21 um 11:42 schrieb Andreas Tille: >>>>> > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:00:59AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: >>>>> >> This can be uploaded to NEW right now, no? >>>>> > +1 >>>>> My fear was that this would take energies away from finishing the >>>>> release. But yes, happily so. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I think release situation for the med team's end is good. >>>>> Since you told me and Etienne in the last video conference that your keys >>>>> expired - do you need sponsoring? >>>>> >>>>> If so, mind linking the repos here? >>>> memoized_property: >>>> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-memoized-property >>>> serializable: >>>> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-serializable >>>> typechecks: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-typechecks >>>> datacache: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-datacache >>>> gftparse: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-gtfparse >>>> pyensembl: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/pyensembl >>>> xpore: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/xpore >>> Uploaded: memoized_property, serializable, typechecks, gftparse after some >>> changes, and enabled salsa CI (consider taking a look) >>> >>> For xpore: There is a "Suggests: python-xpore-doc" However, there is no >>> such -doc package. The docs look good and should be built. Did you forget >>> to push in any case? >> I was just sloppy - please remove that suggestion. > I added a -doc package since building the docs looks good here. However one > question: the package vendors two binaries: usr/bin/xpore-dataprep and > usr/bin/xpore-diffmod > Is this a python application or a python library? Or both? > If it is application, the package needs renaming to simply xpore. > If it is both, the binaries should go into a different binary package -- > thoughts?
Application, after another look at https://xpore.readthedocs.io/en/latest/quickstart.html . Sorry and thanks! Steffen
