On 5/20/21 8:38 PM, Steffen Möller wrote: > > Am 20.05.21 um 16:36 schrieb Nilesh Patra: >> Hi, >> >> On 5/20/21 4:09 PM, Steffen Möller wrote: >>> Am 20.05.21 um 12:19 schrieb Nilesh Patra: >>>> >>>> On Thu, 20 May, 2021, 3:45 pm Steffen Möller, <steffen_moel...@gmx.de >>>> <mailto:steffen_moel...@gmx.de>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 20.05.21 um 11:42 schrieb Andreas Tille: >>>> > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:00:59AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: >>>> >> This can be uploaded to NEW right now, no? >>>> > +1 >>>> My fear was that this would take energies away from finishing the >>>> release. But yes, happily so. >>>> >>>> >>>> I think release situation for the med team's end is good. >>>> Since you told me and Etienne in the last video conference that your keys >>>> expired - do you need sponsoring? >>>> >>>> If so, mind linking the repos here? >>> memoized_property: >>> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-memoized-property >>> serializable: >>> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-serializable >>> typechecks: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-typechecks >>> datacache: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-datacache >>> gftparse: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-gtfparse >>> pyensembl: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/pyensembl >>> xpore: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/xpore >> Uploaded: memoized_property, serializable, typechecks, gftparse after some >> changes, and enabled salsa CI (consider taking a look) >> >> For xpore: There is a "Suggests: python-xpore-doc" However, there is no such >> -doc package. The docs look good and should be built. Did you forget to push >> in any case? > I was just sloppy - please remove that suggestion.
I added a -doc package since building the docs looks good here. However one question: the package vendors two binaries: usr/bin/xpore-dataprep and usr/bin/xpore-diffmod Is this a python application or a python library? Or both? If it is application, the package needs renaming to simply xpore. If it is both, the binaries should go into a different binary package -- thoughts? Nilesh
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
