On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 05:21:16PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader wrote: > * David Schleef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-17 15:23]: > > The Debian Open Use Logo License is generally considered to be > > non-DFSG free. However, it appears to be a widely held belief > > that Debian should have _some_ logo that is DFSG-free, and that > > the license of the open logo should be changed to make this so. > > I think the open use logo itself should be DFSG-free, but it probably > should be accompanied by a trademark license. I'll contact SPI to see > what needs to be done to change the license, and I've asked Matthew > Garrett to discuss the trademark issue with SPI's trademark lawyer and > others on spi-trademark.
You rock.
> What would a good license for the logo be?
Debian-legal, what do you advise?
Luis
--
GnuPG Key fingerprint = 113F B290 C6D2 0251 4D84 A34A 6ADD 4937 E20A 525E
pgpLB4WcDv4lg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
