On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 03:23:22PM -0700, David Schleef wrote: > > The Debian Open Use Logo License is generally considered to be > non-DFSG free. However, it appears to be a widely held belief > that Debian should have _some_ logo that is DFSG-free, and that > the license of the open logo should be changed to make this so. > I think because of the latter, there has never been a logo purge > of main. Perhaps an attempted logo purge would convince SPI to > act on this matter.
What does "convince SPI" mean here? I thought SPI is governed by the Debian developers. > It's somewhat amusing that debian-legal routinely convinces people > to change to DFSG-free licenses, but can't seem to affect its own > organization. The real question is why a project that is dedicated to free software did release a non-free logo in the first place... -- Robert Millan (Debra and Ian) (Gnu's Not (UNiplexed Information and Computing System))/\ (kernel of *(Berkeley Software Distribution))
