* David Schleef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-17 15:23]: > The Debian Open Use Logo License is generally considered to be > non-DFSG free. However, it appears to be a widely held belief > that Debian should have _some_ logo that is DFSG-free, and that > the license of the open logo should be changed to make this so.
I think the open use logo itself should be DFSG-free, but it probably should be accompanied by a trademark license. I'll contact SPI to see what needs to be done to change the license, and I've asked Matthew Garrett to discuss the trademark issue with SPI's trademark lawyer and others on spi-trademark. What would a good license for the logo be? -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
