On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader wrote: > What would a good license for the logo be?
I'd personally suggest a MIT style license like the following: Copyright (c) <year> <copyright holders> Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this Work, to deal in the Work without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Work, and to permit persons to whom the Work is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall accompany all copies or substantial portions of the Work. THE WORK IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE WORK OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE WORK. [Astute readers will note a s/software/work/; and s/be included in/accompany/; from the default license to deal with the fact that this is an image, and the work will typically be so small that it can't include the copyright directly. Someone may be able to come up with better verbiage to avoid this bug...] As far as I know, the above license is compatible with just about everything, is trivially DFSG free, and should allow us to use the image easily. Don Armstrong -- "Because," Fee-5 explained patiently, "I was born in the fifth row. Any fool would understand that, but against stupidity the very Gods themselves contend in vain." -- Alfred Bester _The Computer Connection_ p19 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
