John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> I have. Try the "Choral Public Domain License" > >> (http://cpdl.snaptel.com/license.htm), which is essentially the GPL with > >> "software" replaced by "music". Was constructing that licence a > >> copyright infringement? > > > >Perhaps, but the FSF is not obligated to pursue it, are they? > > Actually they are, if they wish to effectively maintain the copyright:
Oh, rubbish. Copyright doesn't work like that. You're thinking of trademarks perhaps? Edmund
