On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 10:50:31PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 12:44:56AM +0200, Sunnanvind Briling Fenderson wrote: > > A copyright license is a copyrightable work. > > Pleasse supply a reference backing up this assertion, please.
It's a large chunk of text, that took significant creative work to make. Why wouldn't it be copyrightable? I don't see why it's any different from any other textual work of the same size and creative effort. -- David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org "I saw a daemon stare into my face, and an angel touch my breast; each one softly calls my name . . . the daemon scares me less." - "Disciple", Stuart Davis
