John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ironic, but yes, it's their right. Of course the DoJ hasn't exactly cared > about having willing plaintiffs for a few years now when it comes down to > criminal tacks: look at Adobe v Skylarov(sp?).
But this case would have nothing to do with any possible criminal copyright interest. The FSF does not sell copies of the GPL; the CPDL does not make money off its copies. Thomas
