Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 12:44:56AM +0200, Sunnanvind Briling Fenderson wrote: > > A copyright license is a copyrightable work. > > Pleasse supply a reference backing up this assertion, please.
I don't know a reference off the top of my head, but there are some. One case I recall involved a book of forms for wills. Despite these being legal documents, the copyright on them was upheld. > If it said that modifications were allowed, that could be > construed to mean that you could modify the license on a > GPLed work to something other than the GPL. The real fear is that someone could change the text in various ways and continue to call it the GPL.
