On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Per Bothner wrote: > Adam Heath wrote: > > >I have found that, in theory, gcj and gij are compatible, in reality they are > >not. To be compatable, they *MUST* take *EXACTLY* the same arguments as other > >standard $(JAVA) and $(JAVAC). > > > >I've had to put special code into my own build system to switch between > >standard jvms and the gcj suite. > > > I'm not sure what you mean by "other standard $(JAVA) and $(JAVAC)", > except by by reference to what JDK does. We do try to match at least the > most generally-used flags. Patches to improve the command-line processing > of 'gij' and 'gcj -C' so they better match 'java' and 'java' would be > very welcome; > in lieu of that a gnats bug report would also be welcome so at least we know > there is a problem. (No guarantee that it will be fixed, of course.)
Well, -classpath(jdk), --classpath(gcj). Having to specify -C to compile to .class. The goal is to just update an alternative, and be able to use gcj. However, this is not yet p ossible. A wrapper script would suffice, however. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
