> Well, the gcj runtimes (libgcj or whatever the package name is) > should be fixed to provide java-runtime.
Oh.. I had figured it was a deliberate decision on behalf of the gcc maintainers not to provide java-runtime (for reasons such as command-line incompatibility, etc). Ben. -- Ben Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://baasil.humbug.org.au/bab/ Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] He hasn't an enemy in the world, and none of his friends like him. - Oscar Wilde -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
