Adam Heath wrote:
>On 20 Nov 2001, Tom Tromey wrote:
>
>>>>>>>"Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>>>>
>>>>Well, the gcj runtimes (libgcj or whatever the package name is)
>>>>should be fixed to provide java-runtime.
>>>>
>>Ben> Oh.. I had figured it was a deliberate decision on behalf of the
>>Ben> gcc maintainers not to provide java-runtime (for reasons such as
>>Ben> command-line incompatibility, etc).
>>
>>If that's the case, please have them file bug reports in the gcc Gnats
>>system. I'd be interested in addressing the problems, if only I knew
>>what they were.
>>
>
>Why in gnats? gnats has nothing to do with the debian meta information.
>
I believe Tom meant: If you find a problem where gij is command-line
incompatible with javac, then we consider that a bug in gij, not in the
debian packaging of gij, and so the bug should be reported to the "upstream"
maintainers - which means using gnats.
--Per
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
