Adam Heath wrote:
>I have found that, in theory, gcj and gij are compatible, in reality they are
>not. To be compatable, they *MUST* take *EXACTLY* the same arguments as other
>standard $(JAVA) and $(JAVAC).
>
>I've had to put special code into my own build system to switch between
>standard jvms and the gcj suite.
>
I'm not sure what you mean by "other standard $(JAVA) and $(JAVAC)",
except by by reference to what JDK does. We do try to match at least the
most generally-used flags. Patches to improve the command-line processing
of 'gij' and 'gcj -C' so they better match 'java' and 'java' would be
very welcome;
in lieu of that a gnats bug report would also be welcome so at least we know
there is a problem. (No guarantee that it will be fixed, of course.)
--Per Bothner
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
