> eo_EU sajnas la plej bonan kompromison. La Glibc-estro ne povos rifuzi > car eo_EU estas kohera kun la ISO-kodoj kaj la esperantaj uzadoj > bezonas malplej unuan esperantajn lokajojn. > Amike,
Well, I really think that this compromise is worse than eo_XX, really..:-) This seems to be restricting Esperanto to the European Union which is obviously quite suprising for a supposedly universal language. XX *is* a valid ISO-3166 code, in the series of codes that may be used for "local" purposes. On the other hand, EU has a quite special status in ISO-3166. It is mentioned as *not* being an official ISO-3166-1 code, but just "reserved" as the need for it is recognized by the ISO-3166 MA. So, one could argue "against" eo_EU the same way one could argue against eo_XX. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
