Gard Spreemann <g...@nonempty.org> writes: > While I personally think e-mail-based workflows can be quite nice, the > BTS' asynchronous nature did cause me a lot of extra pointless work > when I was an outsider attempting to learn the ropes. Being not 100% > confident with the system, I way too often found myself waiting > minutes – as much as 10 or 15 – for replies to simple operations.
agree with this. Also the noisy reply to every message is pretty unhelpful - even gmail cant work out what is being acknowledged I'd like to help improve the docuemntation, and suggest ways to make it less confusing to use, but the bts's own bug list makes me wonder if anyone would review