debian-devel  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Richard Lewis
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Holger Levsen
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Richard Lewis
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Marc Haber
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Jonathan Dowland
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Marc Haber
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Colin Watson
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Marc Haber
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Sean Whitton
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Matthias Geiger
• #1011572: toilet: Salsa Kirill Rekhov
  • Re: #1011572: toilet: Salsa Daniel Lange
• Bug#1106208: ITP: moonlight-qt -- GameStream client for PCs Jianfeng Liu
• Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge? Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge? Daniel Baumann
  • Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge? Thomas Hochstein
  • Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge? Daniel Baumann
• The Debian Mono "Team" needs help Antoine Le Gonidec
  • Re: The Debian Mono "Team" needs help Aaron Rainbolt
  • Re: The Debian Mono "Team" needs help Ahmad Khalifa
  • Re: The Debian Mono "Team" needs help Antoine Le Gonidec
  • Re: The Debian Mono "Team" needs help Aaron Rainbolt
• Bug#1106128: ITP: pipemixer -- TUI for pipewire Matthias Geiger
• Using alternatives system for directories? Christian Kastner
  • Re: Using alternatives system for directories? Jonas Smedegaard
  • Re: Using alternatives system for directories? Christian Kastner
• Bug#1106085: ITP: play.it-rpg -- ./play.it collection - Role-playing games Antoine Le Gonidec
• Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Roland Mas
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Jonathan Dowland
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Roland Mas
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Jonathan Dowland
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Mechtilde Stehmann
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Mechtilde Stehmann
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Richard Lewis
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Holger Levsen
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: [git-buildpackage] Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Guido Günther
• Bug#1105987: ITP: libterm-choose-linefold-xs-perl -- XS acceleration for Term-Choose-LineFold gregor herrmann
• Bug#1105982: ITP: env-dot -- tool to read environment variables from .env file gregor herrmann
• Bug#1105933: ITP: libcrypt-sysrandom-perl -- Perl interface to system randomness gregor herrmann
• Bug#1105936: ITP: libcrypt-sysrandom-xs-perl -- Perl interface to system randomness, XS version gregor herrmann
• Bug#1105868: ITP: oniux -- Kernel-level Tor isolation for any Linux app Yifei Zhan
• Bug#1105844: ITP: golang-github-xo-tblfmt -- treaming, buffered table encoder for result sets (ie from a database) Otto Kekalainen
• Bug#1105845: ITP: golang-github-ziutek-telnet -- Go library for handling Telnet connections Otto Kekalainen
• Bug#1105842: ITP: golang-github-google-goexpect -- Go implementation of Expect (library) Otto Kekalainen
• Bug#1105843: ITP: golang-github-mattn-go-sixel -- Go library for DRCS Sixel graphics encoding and decoding Otto Kekalainen
• Bug#1105841: ITP: golang-github-gohxs-readline -- Go implementation of GNU Readline (library) Otto Kekalainen
• Bug#1105839: ITP: ovpn-dkms -- OpenVPN data channel offload (ovpn) Bernhard Schmidt
• Re: Question about splitting a source package with an epoch Nicholas D Steeves
  • Re: Question about splitting a source package with an epoch Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Question about splitting a source package with an epoch Simon McVittie
  • Re: Question about splitting a source package with an epoch Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Question about splitting a source package with an epoch Nicholas D Steeves
  • Re: Question about splitting a source package with an epoch Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Question about splitting a source package with an epoch Nicholas D Steeves
  • Re: Question about splitting a source package with an epoch Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Question about splitting a source package with an epoch Holger Levsen
  • Re: Question about splitting a source package with an epoch Andreas Metzler
• Is there any planned official Debian 12 Bookworm support for Raspberry Pi 5? Odephus
  • Re: Is there any planned official Debian 12 Bookworm support for Raspberry Pi 5? Marc Haber
  • Re: Is there any planned official Debian 12 Bookworm support for Raspberry Pi 5? Cyril Brulebois
• Re: Upcoming d-i release vs. hard freeze Simon McVittie
  • Re: Upcoming d-i release vs. hard freeze Cyril Brulebois
  • Re: Upcoming d-i release vs. hard freeze Cyril Brulebois
• Pythonista wanted for help with tag2upload testing Ian Jackson
  • tag2upload progress report (was Re: Pythonista wanted for help with tag2upload testing) Ian Jackson
• Using official Debian images in podman Enrico Zini
  • Re: Using official Debian images in podman Jérémy Lal
• Bug#1105145: ITP: linux-board-support-package-rb3gen2 -- Firmware for RB3Gen2 Roger Shimizu
• Bug#1105114: ITP: hipblas-common -- Header-only common library for hipBLAS and hipBLASLt Spaarsh Thakkar
• Bug#1105109: ITP: zfs-autobackup -- manage zfs snapshots and syncing Jonathan Carter
• Unable to access to Yubikey after recent GPG changes Yadd
  • Re: Unable to access to Yubikey after recent GPG changes Chris Hofstaedtler
  • Re: Unable to access to Yubikey after recent GPG changes Yadd
  • Re: Unable to access to Yubikey after recent GPG changes Andrew Bower
• Trouble posting to debian-devel Antonio Russo
  • Re: Trouble posting to debian-devel Boyuan Yang
  • Re: Trouble posting to debian-devel Antonio Russo
  • Re: Trouble posting to debian-devel Daniel Gröber
• Broken in links in Debian History document - old news removed from www.debian.org Holger Wansing
  • Re: Broken in links in Debian History document - old news removed from www.debian.org Antonio Terceiro
  • Re: Broken in links in Debian History document - old news removed from www.debian.org Philipp Kern
  • Re: Broken in links in Debian History document - old news removed from www.debian.org Helge Kreutzmann
  • Re: Broken in links in Debian History document - old news removed from www.debian.org Thomas Lange
  • Re: Broken in links in Debian History document - old news removed from www.debian.org Thomas Lange
• How should Debian CI handle autopkgtests that require more than three hours Soren Stoutner
  • Re: How should Debian CI handle autopkgtests that require more than three hours Antonio Terceiro
  • Re: How should Debian CI handle autopkgtests that require more than three hours Soren Stoutner
  • Re: How should Debian CI handle autopkgtests that require more than three hours Paul Gevers
  • Re: How should Debian CI handle autopkgtests that require more than three hours Soren Stoutner
• Bug#1104899: ITP: xan -- command line CSV multi-tool Blair Noctis
• status of packages shipping sysv-init script without systemd unit Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: status of packages shipping sysv-init script without systemd unit Chris Hofstaedtler
  • Re: status of packages shipping sysv-init script without systemd unit Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: status of packages shipping sysv-init script without systemd unit Holger Levsen
  • Re: status of packages shipping sysv-init script without systemd unit Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: status of packages shipping sysv-init script without systemd unit Michael Biebl
  • Re: status of packages shipping sysv-init script without systemd unit Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: status of packages shipping sysv-init script without systemd unit IOhannes m zmölnig
  • Re: status of packages shipping sysv-init script without systemd unit Santiago Vila
  • Re: status of packages shipping sysv-init script without systemd unit Santiago Vila
  • Re: status of packages shipping sysv-init script without systemd unit Santiago Vila
  • Re: status of packages shipping sysv-init script without systemd unit Marco d'Itri
• Bug#1104853: ITP: tauri -- desktop application framework with Rust and system WebView Blair Noctis
• ITN procedure? Phil Wyett
  • Re: ITN procedure? Andreas Tille
  • Re: ITN procedure? Jonas Smedegaard
  • Re: ITN procedure? Holger Levsen
  • Re: ITN procedure? Jonas Smedegaard
  • Re: ITN procedure? Soren Stoutner
  • Re: ITN procedure? Joost van Baal-Ilić
  • Re: ITN procedure? Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: ITN procedure? Jonas Smedegaard
  • Re: ITN procedure? Phil Wyett
  • Re: ITN procedure? Andreas Tille
  • Categorially refusing to exercise DPL powers (was: ITN procedure?) G. Branden Robinson
  • Re: Categorially refusing to exercise DPL powers (was: ITN procedure?) Andreas Tille
  • Re: Categorially refusing to exercise DPL powers (was: ITN procedure?) G. Branden Robinson
  • Re: Categorially refusing to exercise DPL powers (was: ITN procedure?) Gunnar Wolf
  • Re: ITN procedure? Andreas Tille
  • Re: ITN procedure? Jonas Smedegaard
  • Re: ITN procedure? Antonio Terceiro
  • Re: ITN procedure? Charles Plessy
  • Re: ITN procedure? Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
  • Re: ITN procedure? Raphael Hertzog
  • Re: ITN procedure? Holger Levsen
  • Re: ITN procedure? Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: ITN procedure? Holger Levsen
  • Re: ITN procedure? Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: ITN procedure? Andreas Tille
  • Re: ITN procedure? Holger Levsen
  • Re: ITN procedure? Andreas Tille
  • Re: ITN procedure? Holger Levsen
  • Re: ITN procedure? Alexandre Detiste
  • Re: ITN procedure? David Prévot
  • Re: ITN procedure? Bálint Réczey
  • Re: ITN procedure? Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: ITN procedure? Holger Levsen
  • Re: ITN procedure? Bill Allombert
  • Re: ITN procedure? Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: ITN procedure? Andreas Tille
  • Re: ITN procedure? Lucas Nussbaum
  • RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Andreas Tille
  • Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Holger Levsen
  • Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Bálint Réczey
  • Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Colin Watson
  • Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Roberto C . Sánchez
  • Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Otto Kekäläinen
  • git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Holger Levsen
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Richard Lewis
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Holger Levsen
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Holger Levsen
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Sean Whitton
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Bálint Réczey
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Sean Whitton
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Sean Whitton
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Simon Josefsson
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Andrius Merkys
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Jonathan McDowell
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Peter B
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Ananthu C V
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Sean Whitton
  • debian/upstream/metadata (Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference) Charles Plessy
  • Re: debian/upstream/metadata (Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference) Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: debian/upstream/metadata (Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference) Julien Plissonneau Duquène
  • Re: debian/upstream/metadata (Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference) Sean Whitton
  • Re: debian/upstream/metadata (Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference) Julien Plissonneau Duquène
  • Re: debian/upstream/metadata (Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference) Sean Whitton
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Simon McVittie
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Marco d'Itri
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Gioele Barabucci
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Marc Haber
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Gioele Barabucci
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Santiago Vila
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) thomas
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Sean Whitton

• Earlier messages
• Later messages