Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As far as the second statement being the reason that most of us want > ndiswrapper in main, that may be true, but it is no excuse to ignore rules > that are very clearly laid out in the SC and DFSG.
I'm a little confused here. How does putting ndiswrapper in contrib violate the SC or the DFSG? It's not as if it's being labelled non-free. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
