Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 05:55:01PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >> Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > As far as the second statement being the reason that most of us want >> > ndiswrapper in main, that may be true, but it is no excuse to ignore rules >> > that are very clearly laid out in the SC and DFSG. >> >> I'm a little confused here. > > Not surprising. > >> How does putting ndiswrapper in contrib violate the SC or the DFSG? > > Who said that it did?
Help me out then. You seemed to suggest that not putting ndiswrapper in main would be to "ignore rules that are very clearly laid out in the SC and DFSG." Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
