Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ndiswrapper is a piece of free software. It does not need non-free tools > to build, and it will execute as a standalone app without any drivers. > The fact that most people use it to enable non-free drivers to work is > largely irrelevant - most people use wine and various other emulators > for similar purposes. > > We have historically allowed all of these in main because we have defined > the criteria for main in the SC and the DFSG. Repeatedly over the past > year or two, several people have been trying to incrementally rewrite > the foundation documents by stealth through a slow process of arguing > for new interpretations of what these documents meant. I see this > entire thread as yet one more attempt at this incremental revisionist > work, and it is worrisome.
If you are arguing that people are acting in bad faith, then please take the argument elsewhere. I find far more worrisome this attitude that other developers are lying. I trust my fellow developers to be honest with me; if you do not, please do not infect threads with such suspicions. I do not see anywhere in the SC or the DFSG reference to the "main" vs. "contrib" distinction. Perhaps I have missed it; can you please point me to it? Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
