Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 01:30:25PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >> Help me out then. You seemed to suggest that not putting ndiswrapper >> in main would be to "ignore rules that are very clearly laid out in >> the SC and DFSG." > > I suggested that the CTTE overriding the developer's judgement in this > instance would be an abuse of power, since the DFSG and SC (not to mention > policy) clearly spell out the requirements for main, and ndiswrapper clearly > meets them.
I think this is clearly incorrect. The DFSG and the SC do not say anything about the requirements for main that I can see. And it is the *job* of the tech-ctte to resolve disputes. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
