On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 05:55:01PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > As far as the second statement being the reason that most of us want
> > ndiswrapper in main, that may be true, but it is no excuse to ignore rules
> > that are very clearly laid out in the SC and DFSG.
> 
> I'm a little confused here.

Not surprising.

> How does putting ndiswrapper in contrib violate the SC or the DFSG?

Who said that it did?

--Adam

-- 
Adam McKenna  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to