On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:25:58 +0100, David N Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:59:15 +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>>
>>> 1. debian-legal is wrong, the GFDL is compatable with the DFSG and
>>> thus should be included in main.
>>
>>
>> Looking over the arguments for and against it in -legal, I am
>> trying to ascertain if this stance has a leg to stand on.
> ... and ?
And what? If someone tries to bring through a GR stating that
MS office warez can be distributed in main since it meets the DFSG,
one might rule that as frivolous and a waste of time.
> I am still trying to ascertain whether debian-legal has a leg to
> stand on.
Only insofar in how they convince people -- like delegates,
for example. I am, for one, convinced that the GFDL does not meet the
standards of freedom the project espouses.
manoj
--
It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so
ingenious.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
