2006/1/22, Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This goes even further here, because the DFSG is not even a strict set of > rules but are guidelines. As we all know, guidelines are subject to > interpretation on a case-by-case basis, that's what distinguishes them > from rules. Therefore, I think a specific application of guidelines can > not be seen as a fact.
As someone who can't vote and thus whose opinion doesn't matter, it seems to me that the issue is that people may actually want to vote multiple ways: 1. debian-legal is wrong, the GFDL is compatable with the DFSG and thus should be included in main. 2. I know the GFDL isn't compatable with the DFSG but I think it should be allowed in main anyway. 3. I know the GFDL isn't compatable with the DFSG but the DFSG is only for software not documentation, so it's allowed in main for documentation only. :) It seems that some people see the vote as meaning 1 and others want meaning 2. The latter would seems to require changing the SC, the former wouldn't. -- Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
