On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:59:15 +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> 1. debian-legal is wrong, the GFDL is compatable with the DFSG and
> thus should be included in main.
Looking over the arguments for and against it in -legal, I am
trying to ascertain if this stance has a leg to stand on.
> 2. I know the GFDL isn't compatable with the DFSG but I think it
> should be allowed in main anyway.
Which is where we are.
> 3. I know the GFDL isn't compatable with the DFSG but the DFSG is
> only for software not documentation, so it's allowed in main for
> documentation only. :)
We have already decided this is incorrect via GR's
> It seems that some people see the vote as meaning 1 and others want
> meaning 2. The latter would seems to require changing the SC, the
> former wouldn't.
Quite. I think that people who want to establish one should
do it separately from this current GR that is trying to explain why
we think it is non-free.
manoj
--
BEWARE! People acting under the influence of human nature.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
