On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:45:40PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:45:26 -0500, Christopher Martin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > So let's start again. Let's say that someone tried put forward a new > > amendment in place of the old. This amendment makes clear its > > intention to assert the position of the Debian Project as viewing > > the GFDL, minus invariant sections, to be sufficiently free to meet > > the DFSG and be included in main. Would you accept the amendment? > > Given all my arguments in previous posts, would you require a > > supermajority for the amendment to pass? > If you want to override the delegates decision that works > licensed under the GFDL are incontrovertibly non-free, that is a > separate GR.
Why should it be a separate GR? That's seems both unnecessary and a bad idea; what's the point in overriding decisions about the GFDL, if it is then declared non-free anyway? Cheers, aj
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
