On Sat, January 21, 2006 21:52, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > So, can the developers dispute this? Obviously, the developer > body can dispute any delegated action. But a GR can't overturn something > seen as fact (so no GR stating PI=exacly 3.14 or 22/7).
Could you please explain how you arrive at the conclusion that an interpretation of guidelines can be seen as a fact? This is not exact science, even though you link it to the value of pi. In judicial systems one can dispute an interpretation of the law at a court, because the law is seen as something that is subject to interpretation. This goes even further here, because the DFSG is not even a strict set of rules but are guidelines. As we all know, guidelines are subject to interpretation on a case-by-case basis, that's what distinguishes them from rules. Therefore, I think a specific application of guidelines can not be seen as a fact. Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
