On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 14:59 +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Ian Campbell <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 13:01 +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > > > >> Ian Campbell <[email protected]> writes: > >> > >>> On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 11:51 +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > >>> > >>>> Ian Campbell <[email protected]> writes: > >>>> > >>>>> On the other hand, the Xen enabled kernel in Lenny turned out to be a > >>>>> bit of a disaster and I could well imagine that the new hypervisor/tools > >>>>> are simply exposing a prexisting bug in that kernel. > >>>> > >>>> It wasn't entirely explicit, but I don't use (and haven't ever used) the > >>>> Xen-enabled lenny kernel: it was way too unstable for production use > >>>> from the very beginning. The guests I'm talking about run the latest > >>>> linux-image-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem kernel (version 2.6.26-26lenny2), > >>>> sporting upstream Xen domU support, and no dom0 support. > >>> > >>> Did pvops in 2.6.26 support migration? I must admit I thought it didn't > >>> yet. > >> > >> It apparently did... but it does not anymore. :( > > > > I can confirm that suspend/restore/migrate support was not added to the > > mainline kernel until commit 0e91398f2a5d which first appeared in > > 2.6.27-rc1. > > > > Not sure what you were testing before but it wasn't 2.6.26 ;-) > > Didn't you port it to the lenny kernel? I'm starting to remember...
Hrm, debian/patches/features/all/xen/tip-x86.patch seems to suggest someone did (and I moved the patch so I guess I knew about it at one point). Ian. -- Ian Campbell Current Noise: Heaven & Hell - Breaking Into Heaven I want to kill everyone here with a cute colorful Hydrogen Bomb!! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
