Ian Campbell <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 13:01 +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > >> Ian Campbell <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 11:51 +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote: >>> >>>> Ian Campbell <[email protected]> writes: >>>> >>>>> On the other hand, the Xen enabled kernel in Lenny turned out to be a >>>>> bit of a disaster and I could well imagine that the new hypervisor/tools >>>>> are simply exposing a prexisting bug in that kernel. >>>> >>>> It wasn't entirely explicit, but I don't use (and haven't ever used) the >>>> Xen-enabled lenny kernel: it was way too unstable for production use >>>> from the very beginning. The guests I'm talking about run the latest >>>> linux-image-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem kernel (version 2.6.26-26lenny2), >>>> sporting upstream Xen domU support, and no dom0 support. >>> >>> Did pvops in 2.6.26 support migration? I must admit I thought it didn't >>> yet. >> >> It apparently did... but it does not anymore. :( > > I can confirm that suspend/restore/migrate support was not added to the > mainline kernel until commit 0e91398f2a5d which first appeared in > 2.6.27-rc1. > > Not sure what you were testing before but it wasn't 2.6.26 ;-)
Didn't you port it to the lenny kernel? I'm starting to remember... -- Cheers, Feri. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
