On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 13:01 +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Ian Campbell <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 11:51 +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > > > >> Ian Campbell <[email protected]> writes: > >> > >>> On the other hand, the Xen enabled kernel in Lenny turned out to be a > >>> bit of a disaster and I could well imagine that the new hypervisor/tools > >>> are simply exposing a prexisting bug in that kernel. > >> > >> It wasn't entirely explicit, but I don't use (and haven't ever used) the > >> Xen-enabled lenny kernel: it was way too unstable for production use > >> from the very beginning. The guests I'm talking about run the latest > >> linux-image-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem kernel (version 2.6.26-26lenny2), > >> sporting upstream Xen domU support, and no dom0 support. > > > > Did pvops in 2.6.26 support migration? I must admit I thought it didn't > > yet. > > It apparently did... but it does not anymore. :(
I can confirm that suspend/restore/migrate support was not added to the mainline kernel until commit 0e91398f2a5d which first appeared in 2.6.27-rc1. Not sure what you were testing before but it wasn't 2.6.26 ;-) Ian. -- Ian Campbell Current Noise: Heaven & Hell - Rock And Roll Angel Good day to deal with people in high places; particularly lonely stewardesses. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
