On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 11:51 +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Ian Campbell <[email protected]> writes: > > > The guest visible hypervisor ABI has been stable since (IIRC) Xen 3.0.0 > > and Xen upstream maintains backwards compatibility for guest visible > > interfaces -- if an old guest was broken by a hypervisor update then > > this is most likely a bug. > > Agreed. > > > On the other hand, the Xen enabled kernel in Lenny turned out to be a > > bit of a disaster and I could well imagine that the new hypervisor/tools > > are simply exposing a prexisting bug in that kernel. > > It wasn't entirely explicit, but I don't use (and haven't ever used) the > Xen-enabled lenny kernel: it was way too unstable for production use > from the very beginning. The guests I'm talking about run the latest > linux-image-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem kernel (version 2.6.26-26lenny2), > sporting upstream Xen domU support, and no dom0 support.
Did pvops in 2.6.26 support migration? I must admit I thought it didn't yet. Ian. -- Ian Campbell Eat drink and be merry, for tomorrow we diet. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
