On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 11:10 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Kernel 2.6.26 are designed for Xen 3, and 2.6.32 are for Xen 4.
This is not at all true. There is no relationship of this sort between Xen releases and guest kernel versions. The guest visible hypervisor ABI has been stable since (IIRC) Xen 3.0.0 and Xen upstream maintains backwards compatibility for guest visible interfaces -- if an old guest was broken by a hypervisor update then this is most likely a bug. On the other hand, the Xen enabled kernel in Lenny turned out to be a bit of a disaster and I could well imagine that the new hypervisor/tools are simply exposing a prexisting bug in that kernel. Due to that and the fact that Lenny is now oldstable you may find there is not much interest in tracking this issue down. Ferenc should definitely make sure you are running the most recent Lenny kernel though, the bug report doesn't include the version of this package AFAICT. Failing that running a Squeeze kernel from the lenny-backports suite is a good option IMHO. Ian -- Ian Campbell You're being followed. Cut out the hanky-panky for a few days.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
