Daniel Pocock dijo [Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 05:03:46PM +0200]: > > Let's stop talking about average number of people in Le Camp. > > > > To have the full access at Le Camp we have to pay 4880 CHF per day. If > > we agree on that than we can host up to 235*13 people during the whole > > camp. > > > > That's it. If at the end less people attended the price to pay is the > > same. If we are more we will pay more. There is no risk factor at all it > > is even better if for the same amount we can host more people. > > Let's put it another way: > > DebCamp, ignore DebConf week: 100 people attend 6 nights, but we are > paying for 235 for 6 nights > > Now, 120 extra people come for `other event' for 6 nights, they pay 54% > of the contract for those nights. 4880 * 6 nights * 0.54 = 16,000 CHF > > 16k CHF: That is like having an extra gold sponsor. How much effort > does it take to find a gold sponsor? If the extra event during DebCamp > week had minimum effort, would that 16,000 CHF be welcome? Or it is > simply not needed at all?
Yes. In my eyes, this would be a *very* good way to improve our situation. Of course I am (and I guess we all are) more than willing to share our camping spot with $otherconf during DebCamp, when we are not stressed about 325 beds being too few. Of course, it could be seen as "subletting" the venue - so its legality should be checked with Le Camp's staff. But I would completely agree. _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
