Hi there! On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:01:20 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 03:08:51PM +0100, Nattie Mayer-Hutchings wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 01:37:45PM +0000, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> > But the issue of attendance during the DebCamp week has very real >> > financial implications - you don't think it is worth looking at options >> > to mitigate such risks? >> >> As much as your willingness to be helpful is appreciated, there has recently >> been a very productive and positive meeting with the management of >> LeCamp, > > I understood it such that his suggestions (and fears) are exactly > based on the outcome of that meeting. Especially the minimum average > of 200 beds is something which came up after that meeting. (c.f. > http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf13/Meetings/minutes-20120814#Conclusions, > first item)
That is not true: the fact that there was a minimum amount of money to have the *whole* venue for ourselves was known since the very first meeting we had with 'Le Camp'. By chance, this happened to coincide with the average number of attendees I used to calculate the initial rough budget (notes 1 and 3): <http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf13/Switzerland/Bid#Rough_budget_calculations> Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca
pgpIGMS4NbRt9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
