Andreas Tille dijo [Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 08:55:25AM +0200]: > On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 01:56:48PM -0400, Richard Darst wrote: > > I'd say that Open Day selection people should also be able to mark > > things as "official", then. > > Since several DebConfs I wonder whether we should change this > > official / unofficial > > branding into > > spnsored / not sponsored > > to express what we *really* mean. It always confuses people what > the distinction between official and unofficial means.
Umh, I agree we should find a clearer wording - But I don't think it means sponsored/not sponsored. Some official talks are not sponsored (i.e. are submitted by people who are not requesting for travel aid or are even paying to attend as professional/corporate). And the role of the talks review team _is_ an academic role, proposals _are_ judged and ranked on how important and relevant are they to our group of people. Possibly a proper wording would be "pre-scheduled/scheduled on site"... Although that's also not precisely true. -- Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
