> Please review this extension to #22609 which now disallows `ALL-MODULE-PATH` 
> without explicit `--module-path` option or a non-existent module path. In 
> addition, this fixes a bug mentioned in #22609 when `ALL-MODULE-PATH` and 
> `--limit-modules` are used in combination. It failed earlier and passes now 
> due to alignment of `ModuleFinder`s. With this patch JEP 493 enabled builds 
> and regular JDK builds behave the same in terms of `ALL-MODULE-PATH`.
> 
> When an explicit module path is being added, there is no difference. All 
> modules on that path will be added as roots. Tests have been added for the 
> various cases and existing tests updated to allow for them to run on JEP 493 
> enabled builds. Thoughts?
> 
> Testing:
> - [x] GHA, `test/jdk/tools/jlink` (all pass)
> - [x] Added jlink test.

Severin Gehwolf has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
commit since the last revision:

  Renaming and test fixes

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22494/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22494/files/8fdf6cd2..7f2c563a

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=22494&range=08
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=22494&range=07-08

  Stats: 14 lines in 3 files changed: 1 ins; 2 del; 11 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22494.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22494/head:pull/22494

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22494

Reply via email to