On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 14:15:11 GMT, Severin Gehwolf <sgehw...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Please review this extension to #22609 which now disallows `ALL-MODULE-PATH`
>> without explicit `--module-path` option or a non-existent module path. In
>> addition, this fixes a bug mentioned in #22609 when `ALL-MODULE-PATH` and
>> `--limit-modules` are used in combination. It failed earlier and passes now
>> due to alignment of `ModuleFinder`s. With this patch JEP 493 enabled builds
>> and regular JDK builds behave the same in terms of `ALL-MODULE-PATH`.
>>
>> When an explicit module path is being added, there is no difference. All
>> modules on that path will be added as roots. Tests have been added for the
>> various cases and existing tests updated to allow for them to run on JEP 493
>> enabled builds. Thoughts?
>>
>> Testing:
>> - [x] GHA, `test/jdk/tools/jlink` (all pass)
>> - [x] Added jlink test.
>
> Severin Gehwolf has updated the pull request incrementally with two
> additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - Test cleanup
> - Only use the combined list when creating the finder
test/jdk/tools/jlink/basic/AllModulePath.java line 258:
> 256: * Verify linked modules using java --list-modules
> 257: */
> 258: private void verifyListModules(Path targetPath, List<String>
> expected) throws Exception {
Suggestion:
private void verifyListModules(Path targetPath, Set<String> expected)
throws Exception {
Can simply use a Set to compare the result and no need to sort `actual` from
the output.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22494#discussion_r1884346204
