On Sat, 25 Mar 2023 12:11:18 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> I hear you but the option is not to use javadoc comments and use block >>> comments :-) >> >> I learned something new today: Javadoc comments and block comments are not >> the same! > > So I changed the references to this ultimate ZIP structure to read like this: > > 'End of central directory record' (END header) > > Example: > > > /** > * Validate that an 'End of central directory record' (END header) > * where the value of the CEN size field exceeds the position of > * the END header is rejected. > > > This way we stick to the 'official' ZIP verbiage but also allow using the > shorter 'END header'. > > What do you think? > Either way you should not need a sponsor and should be good to integrated > when you are ready As a non-committer, I still think I need help from a committer to `/sponsor` this change, right? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12231#discussion_r1148360373
