core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag Anton Artemov
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag Anton Artemov
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag Anton Artemov
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag Leonid Mesnik
• Using jpackage 24 with WiX Toolset 5 or 6, how can I start the app automatically after installation is complete? Davide Perini
  • Re: Using jpackage 24 with WiX Toolset 5 or 6, how can I start the app automatically after installation is complete? Alexey Semenyuk
• RFR: 8360122: Fix java.sql\Connection.java indentation simon
  • Re: RFR: 8360122: Fix java.sql\Connection.java indentation simon
  • Re: RFR: 8360122: Fix java.sql\Connection.java indentation Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8360122: Fix java.sql\Connection.java indentation simon
  • Re: RFR: 8360122: Fix java.sql\Connection.java indentation [v2] simon
  • Re: RFR: 8360122: Fix java.sql\Connection.java indentation Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8360122: Fix java.sql\Connection.java indentation simon
  • Re: RFR: 8360122: Fix java.sql\Connection.java indentation [v2] simon
  • Re: RFR: 8360122: Fix java.sql\Connection.java indentation [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8360122: Fix java.sql\Connection.java indentation [v2] simon
• Re: Interest in Java based attach provider implementation? Magnus Ihse Bursie
• Gatherer JavaDoc Cay Horstmann
  • Re: Gatherer JavaDoc Viktor Klang
• RFR: 8354872: Clarify java.lang.Process resource cleanup Roger Riggs
• RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v8] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v2] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v8] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v2] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v3] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v4] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v5] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v5] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v6] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v7] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v8] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v8] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v8] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v8] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v8] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v8] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v8] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v8] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v8] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v8] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v9] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v10] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v10] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v10] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v12] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v13] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v14] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v14] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v14] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v14] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v14] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v14] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v11] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v15] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8359919: Minor java.util.concurrent doc improvements [v15] Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8359936: StableValues can release the underlying function after complete computation Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8359936: StableValues can release the underlying function after complete computation [v2] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8359936: StableValues can release the underlying function after complete computation [v2] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8359936: StableValues can release the underlying function after complete computation [v2] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8359936: StableValues can release the underlying function after complete computation [v3] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8359936: StableValues can release the underlying function after complete computation [v3] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8359936: StableValues can release the underlying function after complete computation [v3] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8359936: StableValues can release the underlying function after complete computation [v3] Per Minborg
• On Period and DateTimeFormatter Pavel Rappo
  • Re: On Period and DateTimeFormatter David Alayachew
  • Re: On Period and DateTimeFormatter Pavel Rappo
  • Re: On Period and DateTimeFormatter Archie Cobbs
  • Re: On Period and DateTimeFormatter David Alayachew
  • Re: On Period and DateTimeFormatter Stephen Colebourne
  • Re: On Period and DateTimeFormatter Naoto Sato
• Withdrawn: 8352693: Use a simpler console reader instead of JLine for System.console() duke
• RFR: 8358627: tools/sincechecker/modules/java.base/JavaBaseCheckSince.java fails with JDK 26 Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8358627: tools/sincechecker/modules/java.base/JavaBaseCheckSince.java fails with JDK 26 SendaoYan
• RFR: 8359830: Incorrect os.version reported on macOS Tahoe 26 (Beta) Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8359830: Incorrect os.version reported on macOS Tahoe 26 (Beta) Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8359830: Incorrect os.version reported on macOS Tahoe 26 (Beta) Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8359830: Incorrect os.version reported on macOS Tahoe 26 (Beta) Kevin Rushforth
  • Re: RFR: 8359830: Incorrect os.version reported on macOS Tahoe 26 (Beta) Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8359830: Incorrect os.version reported on macOS Tahoe 26 (Beta) Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8359830: Incorrect os.version reported on macOS Tahoe 26 (Beta) Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8359830: Incorrect os.version reported on macOS Tahoe 26 (Beta) Jaikiran Pai
• RFR: 8357739: [jittester] disable the hashCode method Evgeny Nikitin
• We should convert ERROR_PRIVILEGE_NOT_HELD to AccessDeniedException iseki zero
• RFR: 8358533: Improve performance of java.io.Reader.readAllLines Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8358533: Improve performance of java.io.Reader.readAllLines Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8358533: Improve performance of java.io.Reader.readAllLines Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8358533: Improve performance of java.io.Reader.readAllLines Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8358533: Improve performance of java.io.Reader.readAllLines Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8358533: Improve performance of java.io.Reader.readAllLines Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8358533: Improve performance of java.io.Reader.readAllLines Markus KARG
  • Re: RFR: 8358533: Improve performance of java.io.Reader.readAllLines Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8358533: Improve performance of java.io.Reader.readAllLines Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8358533: Improve performance of java.io.Reader.readAllLines Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8358533: Improve performance of java.io.Reader.readAllLines Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8358533: Improve performance of java.io.Reader.readAllLines Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8358533: Improve performance of java.io.Reader.readAllLines Markus KARG
  • Re: RFR: 8358533: Improve performance of java.io.Reader.readAllLines Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8358533: Improve performance of java.io.Reader.readAllLines Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8358533: Improve performance of java.io.Reader.readAllLines Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8358533: Improve performance of java.io.Reader.readAllLines Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8358533: Improve performance of java.io.Reader.readAllLines Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8358533: Improve performance of java.io.Reader.readAllLines Markus KARG
• RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update Alisen Chung
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v3] Damon Nguyen
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update Alisen Chung
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Alisen Chung
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Henry Jen
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Alisen Chung
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Joel Sikström
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Alexey Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Alexey Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Alisen Chung
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Johannes Döbler
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Johannes Döbler
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Alexey Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Alisen Chung
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v3] Alisen Chung
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v4] Alisen Chung
• RFR: 8359732: Make standard i/o encoding related system properties `StaticProperty` Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8359732: Make standard i/o encoding related system properties `StaticProperty` Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8359732: Make standard i/o encoding related system properties `StaticProperty` [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8359732: Make standard i/o encoding related system properties `StaticProperty` Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8359732: Make standard i/o encoding related system properties `StaticProperty` Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8359732: Make standard i/o encoding related system properties `StaticProperty` [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8359732: Make standard i/o encoding related system properties `StaticProperty` Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8359732: Make standard i/o encoding related system properties `StaticProperty` Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8359732: Make standard i/o encoding related system properties `StaticProperty` [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8359732: Make standard i/o encoding related system properties `StaticProperty` [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8359732: Make standard i/o encoding related system properties `StaticProperty` [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8359732: Make standard i/o encoding related system properties `StaticProperty` [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8359732: Make standard i/o encoding related system properties `StaticProperty` [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8359732: Make standard i/o encoding related system properties `StaticProperty` [v4] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8359732: Make standard i/o encoding related system properties `StaticProperty` [v4] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8359732: Make standard i/o encoding related system properties `StaticProperty` [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Integrated: 8359732: Make standard i/o encoding related system properties `StaticProperty` Naoto Sato
• RFR: 8359449: [TEST] open/test/jdk/java/io/File/SymLinks.java Refactor extract method for Windows specific test Dermot Boyle
  • Re: RFR: 8359449: [TEST] open/test/jdk/java/io/File/SymLinks.java Refactor extract method for Windows specific test Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8359449: [TEST] open/test/jdk/java/io/File/SymLinks.java Refactor extract method for Windows specific test duke
  • Integrated: 8359449: [TEST] open/test/jdk/java/io/File/SymLinks.java Refactor extract method for Windows specific test Dermot Boyle
• [jdk25] RFR: 8338140: (str) Add notes to String.trim and String.isEmpty pointing to newer APIs Stuart Marks
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8338140: (str) Add notes to String.trim and String.isEmpty pointing to newer APIs Naoto Sato
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8338140: (str) Add notes to String.trim and String.isEmpty pointing to newer APIs Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8338140: (str) Add notes to String.trim and String.isEmpty pointing to newer APIs Chen Liang
  • [jdk25] Integrated: 8338140: (str) Add notes to String.trim and String.isEmpty pointing to newer APIs Stuart Marks
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8338140: (str) Add notes to String.trim and String.isEmpty pointing to newer APIs Stuart Marks
• StableValue vs Optional Mickael Istria
  • Re: StableValue vs Optional Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: StableValue vs Optional Mickael Istria
  • Re: StableValue vs Optional Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: StableValue vs Optional Mickael Istria
  • Re: StableValue vs Optional Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: StableValue vs Optional Mickael Istria
  • Re: StableValue vs Optional Maurizio Cimadamore
• RFR: 8359735: [Ubuntu 25.10] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java, java/lang/ProcessHandle/InfoTest.java fail due to rust-coreutils Vladimir Petko
  • Re: RFR: 8359735: [Ubuntu 25.10] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java, java/lang/ProcessHandle/InfoTest.java fail due to rust-coreutils Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8359735: [Ubuntu 25.10] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java, java/lang/ProcessHandle/InfoTest.java fail due to rust-coreutils duke
  • Integrated: 8359735: [Ubuntu 25.10] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java, java/lang/ProcessHandle/InfoTest.java fail due to rust-coreutils Vladimir Petko
  • Re: RFR: 8359735: [Ubuntu 25.10] java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java, java/lang/ProcessHandle/InfoTest.java fail due to rust-coreutils Roger Riggs
• Re: concurrency-discuss mailing list Pavel Rappo
• RFR: 8294226: Document missing UnsupportedTemporalTypeException Gautham Krishnan
  • Re: RFR: 8294226: Document missing UnsupportedTemporalTypeException Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8294226: Document missing UnsupportedTemporalTypeException Naoto Sato
• Withdrawn: 8355698: JDK not supporting sleef could cause exception at runtime after JDK-8353786 Hamlin Li
• Re: RFR: 8352565: Add native method implementation of Reference.get() [v11] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8352565: Add native method implementation of Reference.get() [v11] Thomas Schatzl
• Best Practice for Busy Waiting in Java Markus KARG
  • Re: Best Practice for Busy Waiting in Java Archie Cobbs
  • Re: Best Practice for Busy Waiting in Java Markus KARG
  • Re: Best Practice for Busy Waiting in Java Chen Liang
  • Re: Best Practice for Busy Waiting in Java Per-Ake Minborg
  • Re: Best Practice for Busy Waiting in Java Markus KARG
  • Re: Best Practice for Busy Waiting in Java Alan Bateman
  • Re: Best Practice for Busy Waiting in Java Viktor Klang
  • Re: Best Practice for Busy Waiting in Java Markus KARG

• Earlier messages