core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• RFR: 8368172: Make java.time.format.DateTimePrintContext immutable Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8368172: Make java.time.format.DateTimePrintContext immutable Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8290892: C2: Intrinsify Reference.reachabilityFence [v13] Vladimir Ivanov
• Re: RFR: 8365205: C2: Optimize popcount value computation using knownbits [v11] Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 8355223: Improve documentation on @IntrinsicCandidate [v8] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8355223: Improve documentation on @IntrinsicCandidate [v8] Roger Riggs
• Proposal to remove StringConcatFactory#generateMHInlineCopy wenshao
  • Re: Proposal to remove StringConcatFactory#generateMHInlineCopy Claes Redestad
  • Re: Proposal to remove StringConcatFactory#generateMHInlineCopy Chen Liang
  • Re: Proposal to remove StringConcatFactory#generateMHInlineCopy Raffaello Giulietti
• Re: RFR: 8365205: C2: Optimize popcount value computation using knownbits [v10] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8365205: C2: Optimize popcount value computation using knownbits [v10] Hannes Greule
  • Re: RFR: 8365205: C2: Optimize popcount value computation using knownbits [v10] Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 8365205: C2: Optimize popcount value computation using knownbits [v8] Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 8365205: C2: Optimize popcount value computation using knownbits [v3] Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 8365205: C2: Optimize popcount value computation using knownbits [v9] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8365205: C2: Optimize popcount value computation using knownbits [v9] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8365205: C2: Optimize popcount value computation using knownbits [v9] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8365205: C2: Optimize popcount value computation using knownbits [v9] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8365205: C2: Optimize popcount value computation using knownbits [v9] Jatin Bhateja
• Integrated: 8356995: Provide default methods min(T, T) and max(T, T) in Comparator interface Tagir F . Valeev
• Propose to make j.t.f.DateTimePrintContext immutable wenshao
  • Re: Propose to make j.t.f.DateTimePrintContext immutable Chen Liang
• RFR: 8368050: Validation missing in ClassFile signature factories Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8368050: Validation missing in ClassFile signature factories [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8368050: Validation missing in ClassFile signature factories [v3] Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8368050: Validation missing in ClassFile signature factories [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8368050: Validation missing in ClassFile signature factories [v3] Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8368050: Validation missing in ClassFile signature factories [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8368050: Validation missing in ClassFile signature factories [v3] Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8368050: Validation missing in ClassFile signature factories [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8368050: Validation missing in ClassFile signature factories [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8368050: Validation missing in ClassFile signature factories [v5] Chen Liang
• RFR: 8368030: Make package bundlers stateless Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8368030: Make package bundlers stateless Alexey Semenyuk
• RFR: 8368024: Remove StringConcatFactory#generateMHInlineCopy Shaojin Wen
• [jdk25] RFR: 8367031: [backout] Change java.time month/day field types to 'byte' Roger Riggs
  • [jdk25] Withdrawn: 8367031: [backout] Change java.time month/day field types to 'byte' Roger Riggs
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8367031: [backout] Change java.time month/day field types to 'byte' Roger Riggs
• Re: RFR: 8357708: com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection ignores queued LDAP replies if Connection is subsequently closed [v6] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8357708: com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection ignores queued LDAP replies if Connection is subsequently closed [v6] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8357708: com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection ignores queued LDAP replies if Connection is subsequently closed [v6] Aleksei Efimov
  • Re: RFR: 8357708: com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection ignores queued LDAP replies if Connection is subsequently closed [v6] Jaikiran Pai
• RFR: 8367859: Remove nio exception gensrc Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8367859: Remove nio exception gensrc Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8367859: Remove nio exception gensrc Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8367859: Remove nio exception gensrc Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8367859: Remove nio exception gensrc Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8367859: Remove nio exception gensrc Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8367859: Remove nio exception gensrc Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8367859: Remove nio exception gensrc Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8367859: Remove nio exception gensrc Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8367859: Remove nio exception gensrc Brian Burkhalter
  • Integrated: 8367859: Remove nio exception gensrc Magnus Ihse Bursie
• Integrated: 8361950: Update to use jtreg 8 Christian Stein
• RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Christoph Langer
  • Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8367913: LIBDL dependency seems to be not needed for some jdk libs Alexey Ivanov
• Re: RFR: 8361950: Update to use jtreg 8 [v6] Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8361950: Update to use jtreg 8 [v6] Jaikiran Pai
• RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v2] fabioromano1
• Integrated: 8357708: com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection ignores queued LDAP replies if Connection is subsequently closed Jaikiran Pai
• RFR: 8367942: Add API note discussing Double.compareTo total order and IEEE 754 total order Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8367942: Add API note discussing Double.compareTo total order and IEEE 754 total order Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8367942: Add API note discussing Double.compareTo total order and IEEE 754 total order Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8367942: Add API note discussing Double.compareTo total order and IEEE 754 total order Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8367942: Add API note discussing Double.compareTo total order and IEEE 754 total order [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8367942: Add API note discussing Double.compareTo total order and IEEE 754 total order [v2] Chen Liang
• RFR: 8367901: Calendar.roll(hour, 24) returns wrong result Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8367901: Calendar.roll(hour, 24) returns wrong result Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8367901: Calendar.roll(hour, 24) returns wrong result [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8367901: Calendar.roll(hour, 24) returns wrong result [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8367901: Calendar.roll(hour, 24) returns wrong result [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8367901: Calendar.roll(hour, 24) returns wrong result [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8367901: Calendar.roll(hour, 24) returns wrong result [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8367901: Calendar.roll(hour, 24) returns wrong result [v3] Iris Clark
• Stream.concat with varagrs Olexandr Rotan
  • Re: Stream.concat with varagrs Viktor Klang
  • Re: Stream.concat with varagrs Pavel Rappo
  • Re: Stream.concat with varagrs Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: Stream.concat with varagrs Olexandr Rotan
  • Re: Stream.concat with varagrs Olexandr Rotan
  • Re: Stream.concat with varagrs Éamonn McManus
• Re: RFR: 8346719: Add relaunchers to the static JDK image for missing executables [v7] Magnus Ihse Bursie
• Integrated: 8367787: Expand use of representation equivalence terminology in Float16 Joe Darcy
• Re: RFR: 8367787: Expand use of representation equivalence terminology in Float16 Paul Sandoz
• RFR: 8367031: Revert "8334742: Change java.time month/day field types to 'byte'" Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8367031: Regression in serialization of LocalDate class objects Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8367031: Regression in serialization of LocalDate class objects Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8367031: Regression in serialization of LocalDate class objects David Lloyd
  • Re: RFR: 8367031: Regression in serialization of LocalDate class objects Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8367031: Regression in serialization of LocalDate class objects Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8367031: Regression in serialization of LocalDate class objects Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8367031: [backout] Regression in serialization of LocalDate class objects Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8367031: Regression in serialization of LocalDate class objects Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8367031: [backout] Regression in serialization of LocalDate class objects Iris Clark
  • Re: RFR: 8367031: [backout] Change java.time month/day field types to 'byte' Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8367031: [backout] Regression in serialization of LocalDate class objects Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8367031: [backout] Regression in serialization of LocalDate class objects Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8367031: [backout] Regression in serialization of LocalDate class objects Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8367031: [backout] Regression in serialization of LocalDate class objects Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8367031: [backout] Regression in serialization of LocalDate class objects Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8367031: [backout] Regression in serialization of LocalDate class objects Aleksey Shipilev
  • Integrated: 8367031: [backout] Change java.time month/day field types to 'byte' Roger Riggs
• RFR: 8367859: Remove shell script from nio exception gensrc Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8367859: Remove shell script from nio exception gensrc Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8367859: Remove shell script from nio exception gensrc Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8367859: Remove shell script from nio exception gensrc Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8367859: Remove shell script from nio exception gensrc Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8367859: Remove shell script from nio exception gensrc Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8367859: Remove shell script from nio exception gensrc Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8367859: Remove shell script from nio exception gensrc Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Withdrawn: 8367859: Remove shell script from nio exception gensrc Magnus Ihse Bursie
• Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v18] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v18] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v18] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v18] Aleksei Efimov
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v18] Michael McMahon
• Re: RFR: 8346719: Add relaunchers to the static JDK image for missing executables [v10] Magnus Ihse Bursie
• RFR: 8367869: Test java/io/FileDescriptor/Sync.java timed out SendaoYan
• Integrated: 8354242: VectorAPI: combine vector not operation with compare erifan
• Re: RFR: 8361950: Update to use jtreg 8 [v5] Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8361950: Update to use jtreg 8 [v5] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8361950: Update to use jtreg 8 [v5] Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8361950: Update to use jtreg 8 [v5] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8361950: Update to use jtreg 8 [v5] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8361950: Update to use jtreg 8 [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8361950: Update to use jtreg 8 [v5] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8361950: Update to use jtreg 8 [v5] Christian Stein
• RFR: 8355342: File.getCanonicalPath on Java 24 resolves paths on network drives to UNC format Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8355342: File.getCanonicalPath on Java 24 resolves paths on network drives to UNC format [v3] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8355342: File.getCanonicalPath on Java 24 resolves paths on network drives to UNC format [v2] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8355342: File.getCanonicalPath on Java 24 resolves paths on network drives to UNC format [v2] Francesco Andreuzzi
  • Re: RFR: 8355342: File.getCanonicalPath on Java 24 resolves paths on network drives to UNC format [v2] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8355342: File.getCanonicalPath on Java 24 resolves paths on network drives to UNC format [v4] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8355342: File.getCanonicalPath on Java 24 resolves paths on network drives to UNC format [v4] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8355342: File.getCanonicalPath on Java 24 resolves paths on network drives to UNC format [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8355342: File.getCanonicalPath on Java 24 resolves paths on network drives to UNC format [v4] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8355342: File.getCanonicalPath on Java 24 resolves paths on network drives to UNC format [v4] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8355342: File.getCanonicalPath on Java 24 resolves paths on network drives to UNC format [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8355342: File.getCanonicalPath on Java 24 resolves paths on network drives to UNC format [v4] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8355342: File.getCanonicalPath on Java 24 resolves paths on network drives to UNC format [v4] Alan Bateman
• Why is CompositeName used in JNDI/LDAP after all? Osipov, Michael (IN IT IN)
• RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8366421: ModifiedUtf.utfLen may overflow for giant string [v2] Chen Liang
• RFR: 8367573: JNI exception pending in os_getCmdlineAndUserInfo of ProcessHandleImpl_aix.c Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8367573: JNI exception pending in os_getCmdlineAndUserInfo of ProcessHandleImpl_aix.c Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8367573: JNI exception pending in os_getCmdlineAndUserInfo of ProcessHandleImpl_aix.c Matthias Baesken
  • Integrated: 8367573: JNI exception pending in os_getCmdlineAndUserInfo of ProcessHandleImpl_aix.c Matthias Baesken
• RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression Joe Darcy
• RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v4] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v5] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v5] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v3] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v3] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v6] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v6] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v6] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v6] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v6] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v6] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v6] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v6] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v6] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8367704: Fix minor documentation issues in java.time.** [v6] Pavel Rappo

• Earlier messages