I feel that this game involves much psychology (like the holdem poker does), so 
I doubt that a computer may play this game strong against a human.

Dmitry

13.06.2013, 11:47, "Oleg Barmin" <[email protected]>:
> Sorry guys. I sent an old rules version for a chinese poker but not open 
> chinese poker. The difference between them is very major. My fault. the 
> correct rules are http://pokerstakes.com/articles/chinese-poker-rules-strategy
> Sorry once again.
>
> * A video example of a game with two participants:
> * http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=DlE08WkkBic
> * Another video explaining the rules of the game:
> * 
> http://www.cardplayer.com/cptv/channels/3-strategy/poker-videos/4917-poker-strategy-how-to-play-open-faced-chinese-poker
>
> Четверг, 13 июня 2013, 9:32 +02:00 от Stefan Kaitschick 
> <[email protected]>:
>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Don Dailey <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I don't quite see the point. The goal is to find the best possible hand
>>> YOU can make with your 13 cards and there is no betting, so I see no point
>>> in using Monte Carlo here.
>>>
>>> What am I missing?
>>>
>>> Is it whether to sacrifice one of the 3 hands to strengthen the other 2? Or
>>> in the case of a really bad hand to at least make 1 really strong hand?
>>>
>>> Don
>>
>> The problem must be modeling the possible hand constellations and
>> strategies of the opponent(s).
>> So you would probably let the bot deal the remaining 39 cards many times.
>>
>> Stefan
>> _______________________________________________
>> Computer-go mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
>
> Best regards,
> Oleg Barmin.
> ,
> _______________________________________________
> Computer-go mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Reply via email to