DanielLeens commented on issue #13080:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/issues/13080#issuecomment-6595077424

   Hi @sharpca, thanks for the follow-up.
   
   On the CI status: `action_required` on the `Build` check does not mean the 
run is waiting for maintainer approval. For apache/seatunnel the build for a PR 
runs in the contributor's fork, and the PR's `Build` check only reports that 
fork run. On #13081 the check reports "Workflow run detection failed", and 
`sharpca/seatunnel` has no workflow runs at all, so there is no gate a 
maintainer can approve here. The only `action_required` run on the apache side 
is `Label-when-reviewed`, a review-labeling workflow that does not build or 
test anything.
   
   To get CI running:
   1. Open the **Actions** tab of your fork and enable GitHub Actions if it 
shows the enable button.
   2. Select the **Build** workflow, click **Run workflow** and pick the PR 
branch (or push an empty commit).
   3. The PR's `Build` check adopts the fork run within about 15 minutes.
   
   One gap I found while checking the CLI paths on `dev`, which #13081 does not 
touch yet: `--checkpoint-history-status` is parsed in `ClientExecuteCommand` 
with 
`CheckpointStatus.valueOf(clientCommandArgs.getCheckpointHistoryStatus().toUpperCase())`.
 `CheckpointStatus` has `IN_PROGRESS` and `FAILED`, so under `tr-TR` an input 
such as `failed` becomes `FAİLED` and the command reports "Unsupported 
checkpoint history status". This is the same class of CLI enum argument as the 
issue title, so it would be good to fix it in #13081 with `Locale.ROOT` and add 
a matching Turkish-locale assertion. If you prefer to keep #13081 as-is, please 
say so and it can be tracked separately.
   
   Other default-locale conversions I saw in `seatunnel-core` (for example the 
Flink checkpoint mode and time characteristic switches in 
`AbstractFlinkRuntimeEnvironment`) read job config values rather than CLI 
arguments, so they are outside this issue and do not need to block #13081.
   
   Once the fork build has run, the detailed review continues on #13081 itself.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to