DanielLeens commented on PR #12904:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/12904#issuecomment-6383286586

   Thanks @wgzhao for the CI update and for answering @SEZ9's F1 to F8 
questions with exact pointers.
   
   I confirmed the CI fact on the unchanged head `875a7ff788e9`: the fork run 
[wgzhao/seatunnel 
39919297925](https://github.com/wgzhao/seatunnel/actions/runs/39919297925) has 
completed with conclusion `success` for this exact SHA, with no failed jobs. In 
my review of this head I found no source-level blocker and listed this Build as 
the only remaining gate from my side, so that gate is now met and my conclusion 
on `875a7ff788e9` is ready to merge. The two Low UI items in that review remain 
optional.
   
   The formal recheck you asked for in your last line is @SEZ9's own pass on 
their F1 to F8 threads; I am not closing those on their behalf. The final merge 
still needs an approval from a committer with write access. No further action 
is needed from you unless a new review comment comes in.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to