Interesting that so many others like the multiwindow approach. I’ve always 
thought that a horrible design, because you constantly have to fool with them 
to get them out of the way as you work on a document. I like the approach taken 
by Photoshop, where you can dock them them together in the layout that’s most 
effective for you, then mark some columns as being pinned open while others can 
collapse when not in use.

I have Photoshop 5.5 or 6 and love the interface, but because I didn’t want to 
subscribe to Creative Cloud, I try to do photo stuff in other programs as much 
as possible—to get comfortable with other products so it’s not tempting to use 
PS every time. Initially I tried to do as much as possible in Pixelmator, but 
having tool windows scattered all over the place drove me crazy; now I’m using 
Affinity Photo, and the docked toolwindows are a major reason why.

-- 

Charles

On January 9, 2016 at 17:21:14, Rick Mann (rm...@latencyzero.com) wrote:

In complex apps (e.g. CAD apps, IDEs) a given document has many auxiliary 
windows. The trend in UI at Apple has been to consolidate these into panes in a 
single window. I've always preferred separate windows (e.g. separate toolbar 
window).

One more concrete example is in a CAD program: the objects in the document are 
often related to each other hierarchically. There's usually a view of this 
hierarchy using something like an outline table. I can see this naturally 
fitting as either a pane in a split view, or as a separate window. Best of both 
worlds, I suppose, would be a dockable window (a window that can be separate, 
or live as a pane in a split view), but that might be a lot of additional 
coding (is there a nice library that offers this?).

Complicating matters is whether or not each open document shares a single 
instance of these auxiliary windows or has its own. I think something like a 
tool palette is clearly shared (it's more app-global then per-document), but 
the model object hierarchy window is probably per-document.f

Separate windows have tremendous advantages, but I think panes are considered 
more "simple." Simplicity has advantages, but we're talking about complex apps 
that by their nature demand more of their users than something like iPhoto.

Thoughts?


--  
Rick Mann
rm...@latencyzero.com



_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/cejwork%40gmail.com

This email sent to cejw...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to