On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Ted Bullock <tbull...@comlore.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Jonathan Ben-Joseph <jben...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> This is because C truly is the least common denominator when it comes to >> language binding, almost every mainstream language can call directly into C >> shared libraries without much of any boilerplate code (see P/Invoke in .NET >> or ctypes in Python for example). > > Yes this is precisely why. Also, we want to be able to bundle it into > packages so that if someone chooses to install a package outside of > the standard tools (administrative installs for example), CoApp will > be there and be able to get all the dependencies.
Wasn't the idea to include a tiny DLL inside each MSI that is able to download the engine on demand? That tiny DLL is not the same as the entire engine. Olaf _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers Post to : coapp-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
