On 5/18/2010 1:31 PM, Garrett Serack wrote:
If I thought that we were gaining large leaps in productivity for 50k, I
wouldn't have too much of a problem with it.
But realistically what does C++ buy us that C doesn't? I'm just saying the
delta between C and C++ isn't that much (classes, exceptions, templates,
overloading) and we're not dying for those features.
I'm actually thinking on the other end a bit. What if we can tighten our belts
to< 25k for the core? Would we even bother with a bootstrap dll? Could we get
away with embedding the CoApp core with everything? Even if the core chubs out to
60k... perhaps we'd still consider binding that directly into target MSIs.
Garrett Serack | Open Source Software Developer | Microsoft Corporation
I don't make the software you use; I make the software you use better on
Windows.
I'm not writing assembly - however if someone else wants to ;)
that is all
Elizabeth
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers
Post to : coapp-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
