I was referring to the actual in-lining, not the code. It'll need to be separated out to a proper .asm file before running through the Microsoft compilers. Not sure if this artificial limitation exists in gcc land, I'm guessing not.
/rafael On 5/18/2010 7:54 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 5/18/2010 3:32 PM, Rivera, Rafael wrote: > >> Sadly, some of OpenSSL's assembly implementations are inline hacks (e.g. >> bignum). This is going to be a pain to port to x64... using Microsoft's >> compilers. >> > The x86_64 work is already complete, AFAICT. There is an issue that the team > had planned to deprecate ML, but I suspect that it can be revived when relying > on ml64 form the latest toolchain release. > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers Post to : coapp-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
