I'll have this done by EOD tomorrow. G
-----Original Message----- From: coapp-developers-bounces+garretts=microsoft....@lists.launchpad.net [mailto:coapp-developers-bounces+garretts=microsoft....@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of William A. Rowe Jr. Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 5:13 PM To: coapp-developers@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Coapp-developers] Code? On 5/17/2010 6:29 PM, Mark Stone wrote: > I'll talk to Garrett tomorrow about licensing. That may be something I > can take off his plate, since you guys certainly don't want me > touching any actual code. > > Off the top of my head I think we want the New BSD License for now, as > the least restrictive in terms of what code can be combined with what, > and the most flexible in terms of down stream changes if/when we want > to move to a different license. Keep in mind patch contibutions upstream, back to the original projects, fall under a host of origin-project-specific licenses(!) I would be concerned that the BSD family offers no patent assurances, and the AL offers all the same flexibility, with a higher degree of trust in terms of individual contributions. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers Post to : coapp-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers Post to : coapp-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
