Gary
         I've been listening to you guys and my boat has what I think is the 
best of both worlds. One of the POs of my boat put a mid-boom arrangement on 
Liberty but left the bridge deck track in place so we can now use either one. 
When we are on a mooring for a few days I un-clip the bridge deck main sheet 
and put on the mid boom sheet and we have a clean cockpit. We can sail with 
either arrangement but I like the bridge deck one better for sailing.

                                                                                
  Gary Kolc
---- Gary Nylander <gnylan...@atlanticbb.net> wrote: 
> I went the opposite direction on my 30-1. Moved the traveler from just in 
> front of the binnacle and between the seats (imagine a traveler which is two 
> feet long) to the bridgedeck. Yes, it is a pain to get into the cabin when it 
> is centered, but as soon as we stop sailing, it goes to one side and then 
> there's no problem. And, when sailing, much of the time it is over to one 
> side or the other of the companionway. It gives much better sail control.
> 
> But, I have no dodger...
> 
> Gary
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: dwight 
>   To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com 
>   Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 9:18 AM
>   Subject: Re: Stus-List 35-2 traveler question
> 
> 
>   With end boom sheeting on my 35 MKII there is no interference with my 
> rather large dodger on any point of sail.  I have a shorter boom than the 
> standard so for my boat E= 12' or a touch more instead of 13.5' as listed 
> under tech info on the C&C photoalbum site.  Further, mainsheet control from 
> behind the helm or from either side of the boat on the helm seats is totally 
> doable.I know because I do it.  The bridge deck mounted traveler is in the 
> way sometimes for entering an exiting the cabin but that is a trade off 
> against having a traveler in the way of transit to and from the helm.  I 
> would not change the arrangement I hav on my 35 MKII and I feel that the high 
> aspect ratio main sail is an improvement over the standard rig.
> 
>    
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>   From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Della 
> Barba, Joe
>   Sent: January 24, 2014 10:03 AM
>   To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
>   Subject: Re: Stus-List 35-2 traveler question
> 
>    
> 
>   I would go nuts with the traveler across the bridge deck. It would hose up 
> how my dodger works and be a danger to people entering or exiting the cabin. 
> I also love being able to drop the traveler without leaving the helm. YMMV 
> and all ;)
> 
>    
> 
>   As for the mast step, the 35 MK I can suffer from a rotten mast step. I do 
> not know if the MK II is any different. Good news is it is a relatively easy 
> and cheap repair if you do it yourself. It is NOT the same as the issue with 
> the MK III and maybe some others that involves the structure of the hull. 
> Also if the MK II is like the MK I it is not hard to figure out if the boat 
> has the issue from inside the boat.
> 
>    
> 
>   Joe Della Barba
> 
>   C&C 35 MK I
> 
>    
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
>   _______________________________________________
>   This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
>   http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
>   CnC-List@cnc-list.com

_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
CnC-List@cnc-list.com

Reply via email to